SynthesisBMC health services research2024
Revolutionising health and social care: innovative solutions for a brighter tomorrow - a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elevating patient safety education in undergraduate nursing: An integrative review beyond trends.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
- Real-time healthcare staffing optimization using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Canadian Adaptation of REVEAL(OT) for Chronic Pain Management: Rapid Qualitative Analysis Results.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026Article
- Exploring nursing students' perceptions of the clinical learning environment: a sequential mixed-methods study at two Moroccan institutes.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The Actionable Innovation Day Approach: Participatory Model for Advancing Critical Care Innovation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Access to innovation in oncology from patients' perspectives: a qualitative systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Leveraging experience-based co-design to support an innovative health workforce: a graduate certificate in health services innovation case study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Early resident perceptions of clinical readiness in Italy: associations with demographic and educational factors.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of an individual innovation model for nursing students: a mixed-method study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Excluded by design: a qualitative study of inequalities in health and social care innovation.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives on access to oncology innovations: protocol for a systematic meta-aggregation review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- AI-enhanced telemedicine: transforming resource allocation and cost-efficiency analysis via advanced queueing model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing Eldercare: Assessing Clinician's Perception of Linguistic Summaries in Health Monitoring Alert Systems.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of Relational Leadership Guidelines for Primary Healthcare: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of nursing management · 2025Review
- Global reform population health management as stewarded by Higher Expert Medical Science Safety (HEMSS).Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Protocol for leading health services innovation: a hybrid type 2 mixed method implementation trial for developing and assessing a codesigned graduate certificate program in health innovation.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn an era marked by rapid technological advancements, changing demographics, and evolving healthcare needs, the landscape of health services has been undergoing a profound transformation. Innovation has emerged as a central force driving change in the healthcare sector, as stakeholders across the globe strive to enhance the quality, accessibility, and efficiency of healthcare services.
objectiveWithin this dynamic context, this systematic literature review explored the barriers and driving forces behind successful health service innovation.
methodsA comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using the Griffith University Library search engine and databases that included PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINHAL. To achieve the study goal, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the associated PRISMA checklist guided the review and reporting method.
resultsFindings from this review identified a need for a universal definition of health innovation that encompasses the unique complexities and challenges within this context. In our comprehensive analysis of healthcare innovation, we have uncovered pivotal findings that underscore the indispensable nature of a well-structured framework.
conclusionsTo succeed in fostering innovation within the health and social care sectors, it is imperative to establish an overarching organisational culture that meticulously addresses the following key components: team challenges; communication and collaboration; governance goals and authentic leadership, environmental engagement; and innovation endurance. Through systematic analysis of existing literature, this review offers a definition of health innovation, covering its conceptual foundations, determinants, and barriers, and provides a framework for creating an innovative culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.