Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997694›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Explicit motives and personality characteristics in first year medical students: a multicentre quantitative study using McClellands motive disposition theory.

Johanna Flora Rother, Michelle Seer, Stephan Stegt, Tobias Raupach

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna Flora RotherInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg- Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. johanna.rother@ukbonn.de.
Michelle SeerInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg- Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Stephan StegtInstitute for Test Development and Talent Research, ITB Consulting GmbH, Bonn, Germany.
Tobias RaupachInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg- Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the challenging curriculum, medicine is a popular study program. We propose McClelland's Motive Disposition Theory (MDT) as a possible theory for explaining medical students motivation. The theory describes how individuals differ in their behaviour due to their varying manifestations of certain motives. The three motives can thus influence the students behaviour and academic success. Using these motives, complimented with an altruism- and a freedom motive, this study was aimed at investigating young adults' explicit motives to study medicine. In addition, we also wanted to find out whether there are gender differences in motives and other variables such as empathy, emotional intelligence and academic self-concept.

methodsOver 20 universities across Germany were contacted and asked to share the online study with their first semester medical students in the winter term 2022/23, which resulted in a final N = 535. We used validated and reliable measurements, including a self-created and piloted questionnaire covering medicine-specific explicit motives.

resultsComparing the mean scores between motives, we found that the altruism motive was the strongest motive (M = 5.19), followed by freedom (M = 4.88), affiliation (M = 4.72) and achievement (M = 4.59). The power motive achieved the lowest score (M = 3.92). Male students scored significantly higher for power (M = 4.24) than females did (M = 3.80, p < .001), while female students found affiliation more important (M = 4.81) than male students did (M = 4.59, p = .016). Female participants scored significantly higher for emotional intelligence (p = .010) and several personality aspects, including empathy (p < .001), but showed a significantly lower academic self-concept (p = .033), compared to their male colleagues. Nonetheless, the effect sizes were mostly small to medium.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that first-year medical students are primarily motivated by humanitarian factors to study medicine, compared to motives related to money or power. This is mostly in line with earlier studies using qualitative approaches, showing that MDT can be applied to explain explicit motives in medical students.

trial registrationThe longitudinal project, which this study was part of, was registered via OSF ( https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-mfhek-v1 ) on the 28th of September 2022 under the title "Transformation of emotion and motivation factors in medical students during the study progress: A multicenter longitudinal study".

Indexed as

AltruismMotivationPersonalityStudents, MedicalAdultEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEmotional IntelligenceEmpathyFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSelf ConceptSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEmotional intelligenceEmpathyExplicit motivesGender differencesMedical educationMedical studentsMotivationPersonality

Identifiers

PMID38997694
PMCPMC11241869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.