Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997688›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

"Older people will die of old age. I'll die of climate change": engaging children and young people in climate decision making for public health.

Grace Arnot, Samantha Thomas, Hannah Pitt, Simone McCarthy, Elyse Warner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Z-topia: Gen Z perspectives on mental health in a changing climate.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grace ArnotInstitute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. g.arnot@deakin.edu.au.
Samantha ThomasCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Hannah PittInstitute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Simone McCarthyInstitute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Elyse WarnerInstitute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe climate crisis is a significant risk to the health and wellbeing of children, young people, and future generations. While there are calls for children and young people's engagement in climate decision making, current power structures limit their participation. This paper aimed to understand children's perspectives about the impact of the climate crisis on their futures, their ability to influence climate decisions, and strategies and mechanisms to facilitate their greater engagement in decisions made about the climate crisis.

methodsOnline in-depth interviews were conducted with n = 28 children (aged 12-16 years) across Australia. Photo elicitation techniques were used to prompt discussion about how the climate crisis impacted their futures, their ability to influence climate decisions, and strategies and mechanisms to engage them in climate decision making. A reflexive approach to thematic analysis was used to construct three themes from data. Images were analysed for ascribed meanings.

resultsFirst, participants stated that they and future generations will inherit the climate crisis from older generations, specifically decision makers. Second, they described a need to address a range of age-related barriers that limit children and young people's engagement in climate decision making, including perceptions about their capabilities. Finally, they discussed strategies and mechanisms to embed children and young people's perspectives within climate decision making, including at civic and political levels.

conclusionsChildren and young people have the right to be involved in decisions made about the climate crisis which significantly impact their futures, including their health and wellbeing. They argue for structural changes to embed their views in climate decision making, and describe a range of engagement strategies and mechanisms to structure their perspectives and knowledge with decision making processes. Furthermore, genuine involvement of children and young people in climate discussions must avoid youthwashing and tokenistic participation. The public health community can help address barriers to youth participation in climate action and should actively engage and collaborate with children and young people to facilitate their political and democratic influence over the climate crisis. This involves making room and creating an accessible seat at the decision making table to ensure their perspectives are embedded in climate decisions.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDecision MakingPublic HealthAdolescentAustraliaChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchChildrenClimate changeClimate crisisCommercial determinants of healthDecision makingPublic healthQualitativeYoung peopleYouth

Identifiers

PMID38997688
PMCPMC11245781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.