SynthesisSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
An evaluation of morphometry and dehiscence of facial canal: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics in Danish Children and Adults Diagnosed With Neuroborreliosis: A Retrospective Study From January 2016 to January 2024.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Comparison of cone beam-computed and micro-computed tomography data for measuring facial canal dehiscence.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe facial canal (FC) is an extensive bony canal that houses the facial nerve and occupies a central position in the petrous part of temporal bone. It is of utmost significance to otologists due to its dehiscence and relationship to the inner or middle ear components. The main objectives of current investigation are to detect variations in the reported values of FC anatomy that may occur due to different methodology and to elucidate the influence of age and ethnic factors on the morphological features of FC.
methodsThe methodology is adapted to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled weighted estimation was performed to calculate the mean length, angle, and prevalence of dehiscence.
resultsThe cross-sectional shape of FC varied from circular to ellipsoid index and is 1.45 [95% CI, 0.86-2.6]. The mean length of the FC is 34.42 mm [95% CI, 27.62-40.13 mm] and the mean width or diameter is 1.35 mm [95% CI, 1.013-1.63 mm]. The length of the FC in fetuses and children is 21.79 mm [95% CI, 18.44-25.15 mm], and 26.92 mm [95% CI, 23.3-28.3 mm], respectively. In meta-regression, age is observed as a predictor and accounts for 36% of the heterogeneity. The prevalence of FC dehiscence in healthy temporal bones is 29% [95% CI, 20-40%].
conclusionThe different segments of the FC exhibit significant variability and an unusually high incidence of dehiscence, which could potentially have clinical implications for the etiopathogenesis of facial nerve dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38997588What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.