Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997571›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Summary of the National Cancer Institute 2023 Virtual Workshop on Medical Image De-identification-Part 1: Report of the MIDI Task Group - Best Practices and Recommendations, Tools for Conventional Approaches to De-identification, International Approaches to De-identification, and Industry Panel on Image De-identification.

David Clunie, Fred Prior, Michael Rutherford, Stephen Moore, William Parker, Haridimos Kondylakis, Christian Ludwigs, Juergen Klenk, Bob Lou, Lawrence Tony O'Sullivan and 4 more

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sharing a whole-/total-body [Scientific data · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

David CluniePixelMed Publishing, Bangor, PA, USA. dclunie@dclunie.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2406-1145
Fred PriorUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-5683
Michael RutherfordUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2665-753X
Stephen MooreWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-3114
William ParkerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-8716
Haridimos KondylakisInstitute of Computer Science, Foundation of Research & Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9917-4486
Christian LudwigsAigora GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Juergen KlenkDeloitte Consulting, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-4801
Bob LouGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4723-5416
Lawrence Tony O'SullivanIBIS, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Dan MarcusFlywheel, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-5358
Jiri DobesJohn Snow Labs, Lewes, DE, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1383-1950
Abraham GutmanAG Mednet, Boston, MA, USA.
Keyvan FarahaniNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2111-1896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De-identification of medical images intended for research is a core requirement for data-sharing initiatives, particularly as the demand for data for artificial intelligence (AI) applications grows. The Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT) of the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened a virtual workshop with the intent of summarizing the state of the art in de-identification technology and processes and exploring interesting aspects of the subject. This paper summarizes the highlights of the first day of the workshop, the recordings, and presentations of which are publicly available for review. The topics covered included the report of the Medical Image De-Identification Initiative (MIDI) Task Group on best practices and recommendations, tools for conventional approaches to de-identification, international approaches to de-identification, and an industry panel.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingNeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMedical InformaticsNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United StatesBest practicesDe-identificationDICOMInternational concernsWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID38997571
PMCPMC11810855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.