ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
Bilateral renal agenesis: fetal intervention and outcomes.
Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Serial Amnioinfusion Therapy for Treatment of Congenital Bilateral Renal Agenesis-A Systematic Review.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Pooled it
- Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: a multicenter survey of current practices across CHNC and Pedi-ECMO centers.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- CAKUT calculator: a clinical risk prediction tool for in-hospital mortality in neonates with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract admitted to level IV NICUs.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcomes of congenital kidney and urinary tract anomalies: results from a tertiary center.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bilateral renal agenesis (BRA) is a fetal anomaly which leads to anhydramnios and resultant pulmonary hypoplasia. Historically, this anomaly was universally fatal early in the neonatal period due to the severity of the associated lung disease. Over the last 30 years, innovations in fetal therapies-specifically, serial amnioinfusions-have led to instances of infant pulmonary survival and initiation of postnatal dialysis, raising the possibility that early neonatal death may not be inevitable. Amnioinfusions are not without risk, and maternal complications can include prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm labor, infection, and bleeding. The data detailing neonatal outcomes are still limited and actively being collected. Two case series and one non-randomized clinical trial have supplied most of the known outcome data for infants with BRA after prenatal amnioinfusion. Although there are survivors reported in the literature, mortality remains high, with many deaths in infancy due to dialysis-associated sepsis. In addition, previously unknown morbidities have been documented in these infants, including neurologic injury. These challenges, in addition to the mechanical difficulties of providing dialysis to extremely small infants, can result in significant burdens for patients and their caregivers and moral distress for the health care team. The present review aims to explain the pathophysiology of BRA, detail the historical context and rationale for serial amnioinfusions to treat the pulmonary insufficiency associated with BRA, describe the available data regarding outcomes of infants born following prenatal amnioinfusions, discuss ethical issues surrounding this fetal intervention, and describe critical aspects of prenatal counseling for patients considering the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38997547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.