Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997462›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

The nature of the last universal common ancestor and its impact on the early Earth system.

Edmund R R Moody, Sandra Álvarez-Carretero, Tara A Mahendrarajah, James W Clark, Holly C Betts, Nina Dombrowski, Lénárd L Szánthó, Richard A Boyle, Stuart Daines, Xi Chen and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diversity of electron-bifurcating COScience advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Emergence of biosignatures on Earth and implications for life detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Molecular assembly as a universal biosignature measurable by mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. The history of enzyme evolution embedded in metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reply to Szöllősi and Williams: The observation threshold mitigates the bias of transient genes on ancestral reconstruction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Semiartificial COChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Noncontiguous Code for RNA-Guided DNA Recognition Preceded CRISPR.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Divergent evolution of the PRPS enzymes across the tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Edmund R R MoodyBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. edmund.moody@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8785-5006
Sandra Álvarez-CarreteroBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-6286
Tara A MahendrarajahDepartment of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7032-6581
James W ClarkMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Holly C BettsBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nina DombrowskiDepartment of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-2577
Lénárd L SzánthóDepartment of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-2488
Richard A BoyleGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Stuart DainesGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Xi ChenDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7098-607X
Nick LaneDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-3973
Ziheng YangDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3351-7981
Graham A ShieldsDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-3966
Gergely J SzöllősiMTA-ELTE 'Lendulet' Evolutionary Genomics Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Anja SpangDepartment of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-8556
Davide PisaniBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. davide.pisani@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0949-6682
Tom A WilliamsBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. tom.a.williams@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-0223
Timothy M LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. T.M.Lenton@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-7498
Philip C J DonoghueBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. phil.donoghue@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3116-7463

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 714774EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 947317Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation) GBMF9346Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation) GBMF9741John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 62220Leverhulme Trust RF-2022-167RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T012773/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T012951/1Royal Society URF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), its age and its impact on the Earth system have been the subject of vigorous debate across diverse disciplines, often based on disparate data and methods. Age estimates for LUCA are usually based on the fossil record, varying with every reinterpretation. The nature of LUCA's metabolism has proven equally contentious, with some attributing all core metabolisms to LUCA, whereas others reconstruct a simpler life form dependent on geochemistry. Here we infer that LUCA lived ~4.2 Ga (4.09-4.33 Ga) through divergence time analysis of pre-LUCA gene duplicates, calibrated using microbial fossils and isotope records under a new cross-bracing implementation. Phylogenetic reconciliation suggests that LUCA had a genome of at least 2.5 Mb (2.49-2.99 Mb), encoding around 2,600 proteins, comparable to modern prokaryotes. Our results suggest LUCA was a prokaryote-grade anaerobic acetogen that possessed an early immune system. Although LUCA is sometimes perceived as living in isolation, we infer LUCA to have been part of an established ecological system. The metabolism of LUCA would have provided a niche for other microbial community members and hydrogen recycling by atmospheric photochemistry could have supported a modestly productive early ecosystem.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaEarth, PlanetBiological EvolutionFossilsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38997462
PMCPMC11383801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.