ArticleScientific reports2024
Interpretable machine learning for the prediction of death risk in patients with acute diquat poisoning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application, challenges and prospects of artificial intelligence in acute poisoning management.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Exploratory evaluation of the systemic inflammatory response index and internally evaluated machine learning models for prognosis in acute pesticide poisoning.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms in diquat-induced organs injury:insights into cell signaling and potential therapeutic agents.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Review
- Prediction of QTc Prolongation in Acute Poisoning with Atypical Antipsychotics Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Study from Poison Control Center.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Emergency Toxicology: Advancements and Challenges.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- Analysis of clinical characteristics and factors of central nervous system damage caused by acute bipyridine herbicide poisoning.iScience · 2025Article
- Lung Transplant Success in Severe Diquat Poisoning: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- A predictive framework using advanced machine learning approaches for measuring and analyzing the impact of synthetic agrochemicals on human health.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive modeling of methadone poisoning outcomes in children ≤ 5 years: utilizing machine learning and the National Poison Data System for improved clinical decision-making.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop and validate predictive models for assessing the risk of death in patients with acute diquat (DQ) poisoning using innovative machine learning techniques. Additionally, predictive models were evaluated through the application of SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP). A total of 201 consecutive patients from the emergency departments of the First Hospital and Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University admitted for deliberate oral intake of DQ from February 2018 to August 2023 were analysed. The initial clinical data of the patients with acute DQ poisoning were collected. Machine learning methods such as logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and gradient boosting were applied to build the prediction models. The whole sample was split into a training set and a test set at a ratio of 8:2. The performances of these models were assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA). We also used the SHAP interpretation tool to provide an intuitive explanation of the risk of death in patients with DQ poisoning. Logistic regression, random forest, SVM, and gradient boosting models were established, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.91, 0.98, 0.96 and 0.94, respectively. The net benefits were similar across all four models. The four machine learning models can be reliable tools for predicting death risk in patients with acute DQ poisoning. Their combination with SHAP provides explanations for individualized risk prediction, increasing the model transparency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.