Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Effects of experimental canopy openness on wood-inhabiting fungal fruiting diversity across succession.

Jasper Schreiber, Petr Baldrian, Vendula Brabcová, Roland Brandl, Harald Kellner, Jörg Müller, Friederike Roy, Claus Bässler, Franz-Sebastian Krah

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jasper SchreiberFaculty of Biological Sciences, Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Conservation Biology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Petr BaldrianLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14200, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vendula BrabcováLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14200, Prague, Czech Republic.
Roland BrandlFaculty of Biology, Department of Ecology, Animal Ecology, Philips University of Marburg, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Harald KellnerInternational Institute Zittau, Department of Bio- and Environmental Sciences, Technical University Dresden, 02763, Zittau, Germany.
Jörg MüllerField Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany.
Friederike RoyInternational Institute Zittau, Department of Bio- and Environmental Sciences, Technical University Dresden, 02763, Zittau, Germany.
Claus BässlerFaculty of Biological Sciences, Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Conservation Biology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Franz-Sebastian KrahFungal Ecology and BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany. krah@uni-bayreuth.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7866-7508

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BA 5127/3-1Grantová Agentura České Republiky 21-09334J
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the succession of terrestrial plant communities is well studied, less is known about succession on dead wood, especially how it is affected by environmental factors. While temperate forests face increasing canopy mortality, which causes considerable changes in microclimates, it remains unclear how canopy openness affects fungal succession. Here, we used a large real-world experiment to study the effect of closed and opened canopy on treatment-based alpha and beta fungal fruiting diversity. We found increasing diversity in early and decreasing diversity at later stages of succession under both canopies, with a stronger decrease under open canopies. However, the slopes of the diversity versus time relationships did not differ significantly between canopy treatments. The community dissimilarity remained mainly stable between canopies at ca. 25% of species exclusively associated with either canopy treatment. Species exclusive in either canopy treatment showed very low number of occupied objects compared to species occurring in both treatments. Our study showed that canopy loss subtly affected fungal fruiting succession on dead wood, suggesting that most species in the local species pool are specialized or can tolerate variable conditions. Our study indicates that the fruiting of the fungal community on dead wood is resilient against the predicted increase in canopy loss in temperate forests.

Indexed as

BiodiversityForestsFungiWoodFruiting Bodies, FungalTreesCanopy mortalityClimate changeDead woodForest managementFungiMicroclimateSuccession

Identifiers

PMID38997416
PMCPMC11245472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.