Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997414›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Cytotoxic effects and comparative analysis of Ni ion uptake by osteoarthritic and physiological osteoblasts.

Polina Navratilova, Marketa Vejvodova, Tomas Vaculovic, Iva Slaninova, Jan Emmer, Tomas Tomas, Ludek Ryba, Jan Burda, Monika Pavkova Goldbergova

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microwave-Driven Cytocompatible Mn-Doped TiOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. CoNanoscale · 2025
    Article
  5. Trace Elements-Role in Joint Function and Impact on Joint Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Polina NavratilovaDepartment of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marketa VejvodovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomas VaculovicDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, Czech Republic. vaca@mail.muni.cz.
Iva SlaninovaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Building A6, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan Emmer1st Department of Orthopaedics, St. Anne`S University Hospital, Pekarska 53, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomas Tomas1st Department of Orthopaedics, St. Anne`S University Hospital, Pekarska 53, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ludek RybaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Jihlavska 20, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan BurdaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Jihlavska 20, Brno, Czech Republic.
Monika Pavkova GoldbergovaDepartment of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, Czech Republic. goldberg@med.muni.cz.

Funding

Ministry of Health Foundation NU20-08-00149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nickel(Ni)-containing materials have been widely used in a wide range of medical applications, including orthopaedics. Despite their excellent properties, there is still a problem with the release of nickel ions into the patient's body, which can cause changes in the behaviour of surrounding cells and tissues. This study aims to evaluate the effects of Ni on bone cells with an emphasis on the determination of Ni localization in cellular compartments in time. For these purposes, one of the most suitable models for studying the effects induced by metal implants was used-the patient's osteoarthritic cells. Thanks to this it was possible to simulate the pathophysiological conditions in the patient's body, as well as to evaluate the response of the cells which come into direct contact with the material after the implantation of the joint replacement. The largest differences in cell viability, proliferation and cell cycle changes occurred between Ni 0.5 mM and 1 mM concentrations. Time-dependent localization of Ni in cells showed that there is a continuous transport of Ni ions between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, as well as between the cell and the environment. Moreover, osteoarthritic osteoblasts showed faster changes in concentration and ability to accumulate more Ni, especially in the nucleus, than physiological osteoblasts. The differences in Ni accumulation process explains the higher sensitivity of patient osteoblasts to Ni and may be crucial in further studies of implant-derived cytotoxic effects.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationCell SurvivalNickelOsteoarthritisOsteoblastsCell CycleCells, CulturedHumansIonsIonsNickelImplant debrisLaser ablationMetal distributionMetal uptakeNickelOsteoblasts

Identifiers

PMID38997414
PMCPMC11245524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.