Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997306›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Food quality influences behavioural flexibility and cognition in wild house mice.

Ekaterina Gorshkova, Stella Kyomen, Markéta Kaucká, Anja Guenther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ekaterina GorshkovaRG Behavioural Ecology of Individual Differences, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306, Plön, Germany. gorshkova@evolbio.mpg.de.
Stella KyomenRG Evolutionary Developmental Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306, Plön, Germany.
Markéta KauckáRG Evolutionary Developmental Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306, Plön, Germany.
Anja GuentherRG Behavioural Ecology of Individual Differences, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306, Plön, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental change is frequent. To adjust and survive, animals need behavioural flexibility. Recently, cognitive flexibility has emerged as a driving force for adjusting to environmental change. Understanding how environmental factors, such as food quality, influence behavioural and/or more costly cognitive flexibility. Here, we investigate the effects of high-quality versus standard food as well as the effects of different housing conditions on both types of flexibility. Our results show that mice that experienced a poorer diet under seminatural conditions showed greater behavioural but not cognitive flexibility. For cage-housed mice, the results were less clear. However, mice fed a poorer diet performed better in innovative problem-solving, thus showing enhanced cognitive flexibility, which was not apparent in the reversal learning paradigm. The observed differences were most likely due to differences in motivation to obtain food rewards. Additionally, animals on poorer diet had lower brain volume, usually related to lower cognitive task performance at the between-species level. Thus, our study emphasises the importance of environmental conditions on behavioural flexibility at the within-species level, highlights that different test paradigms may lead to different conclusions, and finally shows that cage housing of wild animals may lead to patterns that do not necessarily reflect natural conditions.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCognitionFood QualityAnimalsAnimals, WildBrainDietFemaleHousing, AnimalMaleMiceReward

Identifiers

PMID38997306
PMCPMC11245467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.