ArticleScientific data2024
An UltraMNIST classification benchmark to train CNNs for very large images.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An UltraMNIST classification benchmark to train CNNs for very large images.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are not designed for large scientific images with rich multi-scale features, such as in satellite and microscopy domain. A new phase of development of CNNs especially designed for large images is awaited. However, application-independent high-quality and challenging datasets needed for such development are still missing. We present the 'UltraMNIST dataset' and associated benchmarks for this new research problem of 'training CNNs for large images'. The dataset is simple, representative of wide-ranging challenges in scientific data, and easily customizable for different levels of complexity, smallest and largest features, and sizes of images. Two variants of the problem are discussed: standard version that facilitates the development of novel CNN methods for effective use of the best available GPU resources and the budget-aware version to promote the development of methods that work under constrained GPU memory. Several baselines are presented and the effect of reduced resolution is studied. The presented benchmark dataset and baselines will hopefully trigger the development of new CNN methods for large scientific images.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.