Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38997095›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2025

Increased Synthetic Cytotoxicity of Combinatorial Chemoradiation Therapy in Homologous Recombination Deficient Tumors.

Jennifer Ma, Rachna Shah, Andrew C Bell, Niamh McDermott, Xin Pei, Pier Selenica, Justin Haseltine, Robert Delsite, Atif J Khan, Benjamin H Lok and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jennifer MaDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Rachna ShahDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andrew C BellDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Niamh McDermottDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Xin PeiDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pier SelenicaPathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Justin HaseltineDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Robert DelsiteDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Atif J KhanDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Benjamin H LokDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Departments of Radiation Oncology; Medical Biophysics; Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew J EllisDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Rebecca F AftDepartment of General Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Jeremy SettonDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jorge S Reis-FilhoPathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nadeem RiazDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: riazn@mskcc.org.
Simon N PowellDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: powells@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Targeting Polθ to Overcome PARP Inhibitor Resistance in Homologous Recombination Deficient Breast CancerP50CA247749 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Simon N. Powell · 2020 to 2026
$16.3M
Backup DNA repair in homologous recombination deficient cancersR01CA286111 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Simon N. Powell · 2025 to 2026
$975k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA247749NCI NIH HHS R01 CA286111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHomologous recombination deficient (HRD) tumors are exquisitely sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and when combined with radiation therapy (RT), leads to improved overall survival in multiple cancer types. Whether a subset of tumors with distinct molecular characteristics demonstrate increased benefit from cisplatin and RT (c-RT) is unclear. We hypothesized that HRD tumors, whether associated with BRCA mutations or genomic scars of HRD, exhibit exquisite sensitivity to c-RT, and that HRD may be a significant driver of c-RT benefit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sensitivity to c-RT was examined using isogenic and sporadic breast cancer cell lines. HRD was assessed using 4 assays: RT-induced Rad51 foci, a DR-GFP reporter assay, a genomic scar score (large-scale state transitions [LST]), and clonogenic survival assays. Whole-genome sequencing of 4 breast tumors from a phase 2 clinical trial of neoadjuvant c-RT in triple-negative breast cancer was performed and HRD was defined using HRDetect.

resultsBRCA1/2 deficient cell lines displayed functional HRD based on the Rad51 functional assay, with c-RT to RT or cisplatin interaction ratios (IR) of 1.11 and 26.84 for the BRCA1 isogenic pair at 2 μM cisplatin and 6 Gy, respectively. The highest LST lines demonstrated HRD and synthetic cytotoxicity to c-RT with IR at 2 Gy and cisplatin 20 μM of 7.50, and the lowest LST line with IR of 0.65. Of 4 evaluable patients in the phase 2 trial, one achieved a pathologic complete response with corresponding HRD based on multiple genomic scar scores including HRDetect and LST scores, compared with patients without a pathologic complete response.

conclusionsHRD breast cancers, whether identified by BRCA1/2 mutation status, functional tests, or mutational signatures, appear to be significantly more sensitive to c-RT compared with isogenic controls or tumors without HRD mutational signatures. HRD tumors may be exquisitely sensitive to c-RT which warrants further clinical investigation to guide a precision oncology approach.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHomologous RecombinationRadiation ToleranceTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCell Line, TumorCisplatinFemaleHumansMutationRad51 RecombinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCisplatinRAD51 protein, humanRad51 Recombinase

Identifiers

PMID38997095
PMCPMC11717987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.