Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38996771›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2024

DNA-PK: A synopsis beyond synapsis.

Noah J Goff, Mariia Mikhova, Jens C Schmidt, Katheryn Meek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noah J GoffCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology Genetics & Immunology, Department of Pathobiology & Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Mariia MikhovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Institute for Quantitative Health Sciences and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jens C SchmidtInstitute for Quantitative Health Sciences and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Katheryn MeekCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology Genetics & Immunology, Department of Pathobiology & Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Funding

Relevant Targets of the DNA Dependent Protein KinaseR01AI048758 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MEEK, KATHERYN D · 2000 to 2016
$5.2M
Defining the mechanistic basis of ATM’s impact on VDJ recombinationR01AI147634 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MEEK, KATHERYN D, YU, KEFEI · 2019 to 2024
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048758NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given its central role in life, DNA is remarkably easy to damage. Double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most toxic form of DNA damage, and DSBs pose the greatest danger to genomic integrity. In higher vertebrates, the non-homologous end joining pathway (NHEJ) is the predominate pathway that repairs DSBs. NHEJ has three steps: 1) DNA end recognition by the DNA dependent protein kinase [DNA-PK], 2) DNA end-processing by numerous NHEJ accessory factors, and 3) DNA end ligation by the DNA ligase IV complex (LX4). Although this would appear to be a relatively simple mechanism, it has become increasingly apparent that it is not. Recently, much insight has been derived regarding the mechanism of non-homologous end joining through a proliferation of cryo-EM studies, structure-function mutational experiments informed by these new structural data, and novel single-molecule imaging approaches. An emerging consensus in the field is that NHEJ progresses from initial DSB end recognition by DNA-PK to synapsis of the two DNA ends in a long-range synaptic complex where ends are held too far apart (115 Å) for ligation, and then progress to a short-range synaptic complex where ends are positioned close enough for ligation. What was surprising from these structural studies was the observation of two distinct types of DNA-PK dimers that represent NHEJ long-range complexes. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about the function of the distinct NHEJ synaptic complexes and align this new information with emerging cellular single-molecule microscopy studies as well as with previous studies of DNA-PK's function in repair.

Indexed as

DNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairAnimalsChromosome PairingDNADNA Ligase ATPHumansDNADNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA Ligase ATPDNA-PKNHEJ

Identifiers

PMID38996771
PMCPMC11369974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.