Trial reportESMO open2024
Dermatology-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid with or without panitumumab (Pmab) maintenance after FOLFOX + Pmab induction: a prespecified secondary analysis of the phase II randomized PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212) trial.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01991873 (Randomized Phase II Study for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Maintenance Treatment With 5-FU/FA Plus Panitumumab vs. 5-FU/FA Alone After Prior Induction Treatment With mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab and Re-induction With mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab in Case of Progression for First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Phase II Study for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Maintenance Treatment With 5-FU/FA Plus Panitumumab vs. 5-FU/FA Alone After Prior Induction Treatment With mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab and Re-induction With mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab in Case of Progression for First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary tumor sidedness and negative hyperselection to modulate anti-EGFR-based maintenance strategies in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials.British journal of cancer · 2025Trial
- Article
- Psychometric evaluations of the simplified Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors 18 (FACT-EGFRI-18-sC) for measuring dermatologic toxicities in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with EGFRIs.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe key endpoints for the assessment of the effect of maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are survival and quality-of-life outcomes. We aimed to compare dermatology-related quality of life (DRQOL) in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) + panitumumab (Pmab) versus FU/FA alone as maintenance therapy after folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin + Pmab induction. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe phase II randomized PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212; NCT01991873) trial included 387 patients at 70 community/academic sites in Germany. For this prespecified secondary analysis, DRQOL outcomes were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (FACT-EGFRI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Skindex-16 questionnaires at every second cycle of therapy until disease progression/death.
resultsAt least one DRQOL questionnaire was completed by a total of 310/377 (82%) patients who received induction therapy, and by 216/248 (87%) patients who were randomized and received maintenance therapy. Patients who experienced skin toxicity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) during induction therapy had significantly worse DRQOL according to all three measures, compared to those who did not [i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 2 -12.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.01 to -5.73; P < 0.001]. During maintenance therapy, significantly improved recovery was observed in all DRQOL measures for patients receiving FU/FA, compared to those receiving additional Pmab (i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 6 -16.53; 95% CI -22.68 to -10.38; P < 0.001).
conclusionsIn this secondary analysis of a phase II randomized clinical trial, patient-reported DRQOL outcomes correlated with skin toxicity according to NCI-CTCAE during induction therapy. Maintenance therapy with FU/FA + Pmab was associated with deteriorated DRQOL versus FU/FA alone in patients with RAS wt mCRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.