Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38996412›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural engineering2024

Scaffold design considerations for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Le Yu, Carly Jane Bennett, Chung-Hsun Lin, Su Yan, Jian Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The interaction between oxidative stress and Schwann cells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Le YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-7091
Carly Jane BennettDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0005-3288-8117
Chung-Hsun LinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0007-9999-6352
Su YanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States of America.
Jian YangBiomedical Engineering Program, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0695-828X

Funding

Novel nanoparticles to stimulate therapeutic angiogenesis in peripheral arterial diseaseR01HL158204 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI LIU, LI, NGUYEN, KYTAI TRUONG · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
Photoacoustic and epigenetic nerve scaffold for nerve regenerationR01NS123433 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Su Yan · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158204NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) represents a serious clinical and public health problem due to its high incurrence and poor spontaneous recovery. Compared to autograft, which is still the best current practice for long-gap peripheral nerve defects in clinics, the use of polymer-based biodegradable nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) has been gaining momentum as an alternative to guide the repair of severe PNI without the need of secondary surgery and donor nerve tissue. However, simple hollow cylindrical tubes can barely outperform autograft in terms of the regenerative efficiency especially in critical sized PNI. With the rapid development of tissue engineering technology and materials science, various functionalized NGCs have emerged to enhance nerve regeneration over the past decades. From the aspect of scaffold design considerations, with a specific focus on biodegradable polymers, this review aims to summarize the recent advances in NGCs by addressing the onerous demands of biomaterial selections, structural designs, and manufacturing techniques that contributes to the biocompatibility, degradation rate, mechanical properties, drug encapsulation and release efficiency, immunomodulation, angiogenesis, and the overall nerve regeneration potential of NGCs. In addition, several commercially available NGCs along with their regulation pathways and clinical applications are compared and discussed. Lastly, we discuss the current challenges and future directions attempting to provide inspiration for the future design of ideal NGCs that can completely cure long-gap peripheral nerve defects.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansPeripheral NervesTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsnerve guidance conduitsperipheral nerve regenerationscaffold designtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38996412
PMCPMC11883895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.