Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38996225›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024

Lumbar Range of Motion Using the Wolfson Modified Schober Test.

Raphael Lotan, Lev Klatzkin, Itzik Lan, Mojahed Sakhnini, Oded Hershkovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raphael LotanFrom the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel (Dr. Lotan, Dr. Klatzkin, Dr. Lan, and Dr. Hershkovich), affiliated to the School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Dr. Lotan, Dr. Klatzkin, Dr. Lan, and Dr. Hershkovich), and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ziv Medical Center, Zfat, Israel (Dr. Sakhnini), affiliated to the Bar Ilan University, Bnei Brak, Israel (Dr. Sakhnini).
Lev Klatzkin
Itzik Lan
Mojahed Sakhnini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLumbar range of motion (ROM) is a critical component of spinal function and often affected by age and sex. This study aimed to evaluate the variations in lumbar ROM across different age groups in a healthy adult population and determine the influence of sex, height, weight, and body mass index.

methodsA total of 208 subjects (106 men, 102 women) were recruited and stratified into age groups from the 20s to 60s and older. Lumbar ROM was measured using the Wolfson modified Schober test. Data were analyzed for flexion, extension, and total ROM. Linear regression examined the predictors of lumbar ROM.

resultsThe study found a progressive decline in lumbar flexion and total ROM with age. Age was the only notable predictor of lumbar flexion, with no notable effect of weight and body mass index on ROM. Extension measurements were inconsistent and did not show a clear pattern across age groups. DISCUSSION: Age-related changes in lumbar ROM were consistent with known physiological changes within the spine. Despite physical differences in height and weight, the lumbar spine ROM was similar between sexes, highlighting the influence of age over sex in lumbar motion. Lumbar ROM decreases with age, with flexion affected more than extension.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeRange of Motion, ArticularAdultAgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical ExaminationSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38996225
PMCPMC11239164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.