Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38996224›Full record

ArticleACS sensors2024

Multipressure Sampling for Improving the Performance of MOF-based Electronic Noses.

Brian A Day, Nicolas I Ahualli, Christopher E Wilmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian A DayDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3769-6462
Nicolas I AhualliDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.
Christopher E WilmerDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7440-5727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a promising class of porous materials for the design of gas sensing arrays, which are often called electronic noses. Due to their chemical and structural tunability, MOFs are a highly diverse class of materials that align well with the similarly diverse class of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of interest in many gas detection applications. In principle, by choosing the right combination of cross-sensitive MOFs, layered on appropriate signal transducers, one can design an array that yields detailed information about the composition of a complex gas mixture. However, despite the vast number of MOFs from which one can choose, gas sensing arrays that rely too heavily on distinct chemistries can be impractical from the cost and complexity perspective. On the other hand, it is difficult for small arrays to have the desired selectivity and sensitivity for challenging sensing applications, such as detecting weakly adsorbing gases with weak signals, or conversely, strongly adsorbing gases that readily saturate MOF pores. In this work, we employed gas adsorption simulations to explore the use of a variable pressure sensing array as a means of improving both sensitivity and selectivity as well as increasing the information content provided by each array. We studied nine different MOFs (HKUST-1, IRMOF-1, MgMOF-74, MOF-177, MOF-801, NU-100, NU-125, UiO-66, and ZIF-8) and four different gas mixtures, each containing nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and exactly one of the hydrogen, methane, hydrogen sulfide, or benzene. We found that by lowering the pressure, we can limit the saturation of MOFs, and by raising the pressure, we can concentrate weakly adsorbing gases, in both cases, improving gas detection with the resulting arrays. In many cases, changing the system pressure yielded a better improvement in performance (as measured by the Kullback-Liebler divergence of gas composition probability distributions) than including additional MOFs. We thus demonstrated and quantified how sensing at multiple pressures can increase information content and cross-sensitivity in MOF-based arrays while limiting the number of unique materials needed in the device.

Indexed as

Metal-Organic FrameworksAdsorptionGasesPressureVolatile Organic CompoundsGasesMetal-Organic FrameworksVolatile Organic Compoundsbenzenechemical sensingelectronic nosehydrogen sulfidemetal−organic frameworkmethanemolecular simulations

Identifiers

PMID38996224
PMCPMC11287752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.