ArticleBlood2024
Risk prediction for clonal cytopenia: multicenter real-world evidence.
Article in Blood, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Derivation of a blood count-based machine learning model to prioritise sequencing for high-risk clonal haematopoiesis: a retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Long-term mutational analysis, clonal metrics, and dynamics in patients with chronic idiopathic neutropenia.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Cardio-Oncological Sequelae of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Role of Clonal Hematopoiesis in Cardiovascular Risk.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Clinical and molecular characteristics of clonal monocytosis with and without cytopenia(s).Leukemia · 2026Article
- Clinical management of clonal hematopoiesis.Cancer · 2026Review
- Bone marrow failure syndromes across the age spectrum: diagnostic and therapeutic principles.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes: 2026 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification and Management.American journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Drivers of Inflammation; Clonal Hematopoiesis: Clinical Implications.Balkan medical journal · 2026Article
- A 2026 update on myelodysplastic neoplasms: current state, challenges and future directions.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Clonal hematopoiesis in the setting of sickle cell disease and its relevance to curative therapies.Seminars in hematology · 2026Article
- Clinical, Genetic, and Pathologic Variability in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Precursor Conditions Across Race, Ethnicity, and Sex.American journal of hematology · 2026Observational
- Time-Dependent Prognostic Value of the mEASIX Score in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CHIP clinics: a practical overview of structure and function.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Is Unidentified Cytopenia Truly Unidentified? Or Are We Overlooking Clonality?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Clonal hematopoiesis and its progression to myeloid neoplasms: insights into risk, biology, and therapeutic strategies.Haematologica · 2026Review
- What's hidden in plain sight? Impact of clonal hematopoiesis on the risk and progression of nonhematologic cancers.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Clinical decisions in clonal hematopoiesis: a contemporary review for clinicians.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Spectrum, prevalence, and clinical correlates of PPM1D mutations in patients with clonal hematopoiesis and clonal cytopenias.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractClonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) represents a distinct disease entity characterized by myeloid-related somatic mutations with a variant allele fraction of ≥2% in individuals with unexplained cytopenia(s) but without a myeloid neoplasm (MN). Notably, CCUS carries a risk of progressing to MN, particularly in cases featuring high-risk mutations. Understanding CCUS requires dedicated studies to elucidate its risk factors and natural history. Our analysis of 357 patients with CCUS investigated the interplay between clonality, cytopenia, and prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified 3 key adverse prognostic factors: the presence of splicing mutation(s) (score = 2 points), platelet count of <100 × 109/L (score = 2.5), and ≥2 mutations (score = 3). Variable scores were based on the coefficients from the Cox proportional hazards model. This led to the development of the clonal cytopenia risk score (CCRS), which stratified patients into low- (score of <2.5 points), intermediate- (score of 2.5 to <5), and high-risk (score of ≥5) groups. The CCRS effectively predicted 2-year cumulative incidence of MN for low- (6.4%), intermediate- (14.1%), and high-risk (37.2%) groups, respectively, by the Gray test (P < .0001). We further validated the CCRS by applying it to an independent CCUS cohort of 104 patients, demonstrating a c-index of 0.64 (P = .005) in stratifying the cumulative incidence of MN. Our study underscores the importance of integrating clinical and molecular data to assess the risk of CCUS progression, making the CCRS a valuable tool that is practical and easily calculable. These findings are clinically relevant, shaping the management strategies for CCUS and informing future clinical trial designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.