Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38995922›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Translation, validation, and factor structure of the Nepali version of postpartum bonding questionnaires (PBQ-N) among postpartum women in Nepal.

Sangita Pudasainee-Kapri, Tumla Shrestha, Thomas Dahan, Mary Wunnenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sangita Pudasainee-KapriSchool of Nursing-Camden, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-8553
Tumla ShresthaMaharajgunj Nursing Campus, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-1286
Thomas DahanSchool of Nursing-Camden, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7292-9845
Mary WunnenbergSchool of Nursing-Camden, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8197-9449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties of the Nepali version of the PBQ (PBQ-N) among postpartum mothers in Kathmandu, Nepal. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with postpartum mothers (n = 128) of an infant aged one to six months visiting immunization clinics at two selected hospitals in Kathmandu, Nepal. The PBQ scale was translated into Nepali language and backtranslated to English with the help of language and content experts. The PBQ-N was then assessed for factor structure, validity, and reliability. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine construct validity of the PBQ-N in which 16 items (α = .75) of the original 25 items grouped into three subscales and were found suitable to measure mother-infant bonding among Nepalese women. Regarding convergent validity, a statistically significant, positive correlation was found between the PBQ-N and postpartum depression (r = .627, p < .001). In addition, a statistically significant, negative association was found between parenting self-efficacy and the PBQ-N (r = -.496, p < .001). The three subscales demonstrated good internal consistency. Findings indicate adequate estimates of validity and reliability for the PBQ-N in which 16-item measures were considered adequate for screening mother-infant bonding among Nepalese women and are useful for clinical and research purposes. Considering the crucial role of maternal-infant bonding relationships, the use of validated measures is recommended to screen high-risk infants in clinical settings.

Identifiers

PMID38995922
PMCPMC11244797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.