ArticleJAMA network open2024
Representation of Older Adults in the ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intravascular imaging vs. angiography alone to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Coronary artery disease · 2026Pooled it
- Representation of Older Adults and Women in Randomized Trials of Noninvasive Imaging for Chest Pain.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in older adults with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Pooled it
- The Effect of Age on Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Clinical cardiology · 2026Trial
- Coronary Artery Revascularization in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- PCSK9 inhibitors and aging: Does chronological age matter?Atherosclerosis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.