Observational studyInfection2025
Clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infection in patients with end-stage renal disease in intensive care units: a multicenter retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial profile and antimicrobial resistance in patients with pulmonary infection: a retrospective tertiary hospital-based study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Safety Profiles of Polymyxins, Aminoglycosides, and Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (IMI/REL) in the Treatment of Gram-Negative Infections: A Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in intensive care units and prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Clinical Features of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Comparative Study of Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Eravacycline Treatment for Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) present a considerable global threat due to their challenging treatment and increased mortality rates, with bloodstream infection (BSI) having the highest mortality rate. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) face an increased risk of BSI. Limited data are available regarding the prognosis and treatment outcomes of CRGNB-BSI in patients with ESRD in intensive care units (ICUs).
methodsThis multi-center retrospective observational study included a total of 149 ICU patients with ESRD and CRGNB-BSI in Taiwan from January 2015 to December 2019. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were assessed, and multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for day-28 mortality and the impact of antimicrobial therapy regimen on treatment outcomes.
resultsAmong the 149 patients, a total of 127 patients (85.2%) acquired BSI in the ICU, with catheter-related infections (47.7%) and pneumonia (32.2%) being the most common etiologies. Acinetobacter baumannii (49.0%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.5%) were the most frequently isolated pathogens. The day-28 mortality rate from BSI onset was 52.3%, and in-hospital mortality was 73.2%, with survivors experiencing prolonged hospital stays. A higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.35) and shock status (aHR, 2.12; 95% CI 1.14-3.94) independently predicted day-28 mortality. Colistin-based therapy reduced day-28 mortality in patients with shock, a SOFA score of ≥ 13, and Acinetobacter baumannii-related BSI.
conclusionsCRGNB-BSI led to high mortality in critically ill patients with ESRD. Day-28 mortality was independently predicted by a higher SOFA score and shock status. In patients with higher disease severity and Acinetobacter baumannii-related BSI, colistin-based therapy improved treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38995550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.