Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38995504›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2024

Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents/Adults with Atopic Dermatitis Meeting Severity Thresholds for Systemic Therapy: Exploratory Analysis of Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Studies.

Eric L Simpson, Leon Kircik, Andrew Blauvelt, Howard Kallender, Daniel Sturm, Mingyue Wang, Lawrence F Eichenfield

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03745638 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, 8-Week, Vehicle-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by a Long-Term Safety Extension Period in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2018 to 2020Enrolled631ConditionsAtopic DermatitisArmsRuxolitinib Cream, Vehicle Cream
NCT03745651 phase3completednot on this map

Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 2 (TRuE AD2) - A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, 8-Week, Vehicle-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by a Long-Term Safety Extension Period in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2018 to 2020Enrolled618ConditionsAtopic DermatitisArmsRuxolitinib cream, Vehicle cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Innovations and Emerging Therapies in Atopic Dermatitis Part 2.Current treatment options in allergy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric L SimpsonOregon Health & Science University, 3303 S. Bond Ave, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. simpsone@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-0252
Leon KircikIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-2151
Andrew BlauveltOregon Medical Research Center, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2633-985X
Howard KallenderIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5634-883X
Daniel SturmIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4413-8429
Mingyue WangIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Lawrence F EichenfieldDepartments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-0474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStandard therapy for patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) typically includes topical therapies; however, patients with more extensive AD and/or AD refractory to topical therapy may benefit from systemic treatment. Ruxolitinib cream monotherapy has demonstrated superior antipruritic and anti-inflammatory effects versus vehicle in patients with mild to moderate AD, and long-term disease control with as-needed use. Here, efficacy/safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through 52 weeks was assessed in a subset of patients with moderate and/or more extensive disease.

methodsThis post hoc analysis of TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 included patients who, at baseline, had Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, and affected body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10% (higher severity of disease threshold subgroup). Disease control and safety were assessed.

resultsOf 1249 patients in the overall population, 78 (6.2%) met all higher severity of disease threshold criteria (continuous-use vehicle-controlled period: 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, n = 32; vehicle, n = 13); 28 and 4 of these patients, respectively, continued as-needed 1.5% ruxolitinib cream during the long-term safety (LTS) period. At week 8 (continuous-use), IGA-treatment success (IGA 0/1, with ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) was achieved by 19/32 (59.4%) patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus no patients applying vehicle. In the LTS period, those achieving clear/almost clear skin increased from 19/28 patients (67.9%; continuous-use: week 8) to 18/23 patients (78.3%; as-needed use: week 52) in patients applying ruxolitinib cream from day 1. Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated, with few application site reactions, regardless of disease severity threshold. Efficacy and safety results were similar to the overall study population.

conclusionPatients with AD who meet standard disease severity eligibility criteria for systemic therapy may achieve IGA-treatment success with clear/almost clear skin with continuous-use ruxolitinib cream, and maintain long term-disease control with as-needed ruxolitinib cream monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03745638/NCT03745651.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisJAKJanus kinase inhibitionRuxolitinib cream

Identifiers

PMID38995504
PMCPMC11333780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.