Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38995492›Full record

ReviewApplied health economics and health policy2024

Use of Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in Healthcare Public Policy: Progress and Challenges.

Oscar Espinosa, Paul Rodríguez-Lesmes, Giancarlo Romano, Esteban Orozco, Sergio Basto, Diego Ávila, Lorena Mesa, Hernán Enríquez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied health economics and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oscar EspinosaEconomic Models and Quantitative Methods Research Group, Centro de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia and Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-0509
Paul Rodríguez-LesmesSchool of Economics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, DC, Colombia. paul.rodriguez@urosario.edu.co.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-3062
Giancarlo RomanoDirectorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Esteban OrozcoDirectorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Sergio BastoDirectorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Diego ÁvilaEconomic Models and Quantitative Methods Research Group, Centro de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia and Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Lorena MesaDirectorate of Qualitative Methods and Social Research, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Duitama, Colombia.
Hernán EnríquezSchool of Economics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.

Funding

World Bank Group Fulbright-Colciencias and Colombia Científica - Alianza EFI no 60185 contract no FP44842- 220-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article offers a comparative analysis of the influence of cost-effectiveness thresholds in the decision-making processes in financing policies, coverage, and price regulation of health technologies in nine countries. We investigated whether countries used cost-effectiveness thresholds for public health policy decision making and found that few countries have adopted the cost-effectiveness threshold as an official criterion for financing, reimbursement, or pricing. However, in countries where it is applied, such as Thailand, the results have been very favorable in terms of minimizing health technology prices and ensuring the financial sustainability of the health system. Although the cost-effectiveness threshold has opportunities for improvement, particularly in certain institutional contexts and with adequate participation of the different strategic actors in the formulation of public policy, its potential use and added value are significant in various aspects.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHealth PolicyHumansPolicy MakingPublic PolicyThailand

Identifiers

PMID38995492
PMCPMC11470905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.