Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38995411›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Surgical step recognition in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence: a proof-of-concept study.

Mitsumasa Yoshida, Daichi Kitaguchi, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Hiroki Matsuzaki, Yuto Ishikawa, Masahiro Yura, Tetsuo Akimoto, Takahiro Kinoshita, Masaaki Ito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mitsumasa YoshidaGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Daichi KitaguchiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6- 5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Nobuyoshi TakeshitaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6- 5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Hiroki MatsuzakiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6- 5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Yuto IshikawaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6- 5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Masahiro YuraGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Tetsuo AkimotoCourse of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2- 1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ward, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Takahiro KinoshitaGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6- 5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. maito@east.ncc.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) is a difficult procedure for early career surgeons. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based surgical step recognition is crucial for establishing context-aware computer-aided surgery systems. In this study, we aimed to develop an automatic recognition model for LDG using AI and evaluate its performance.

methodsPatients who underwent LDG at our institution in 2019 were included in this study. Surgical video data were classified into the following nine steps: (1) Port insertion; (2) Lymphadenectomy on the left side of the greater curvature; (3) Lymphadenectomy on the right side of the greater curvature; (4) Division of the duodenum; (5) Lymphadenectomy of the suprapancreatic area; (6) Lymphadenectomy on the lesser curvature; (7) Division of the stomach; (8) Reconstruction; and (9) From reconstruction to completion of surgery. Two gastric surgeons manually assigned all annotation labels. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based image classification was further employed to identify surgical steps.

resultsThe dataset comprised 40 LDG videos. Over 1,000,000 frames with annotated labels of the LDG steps were used to train the deep-learning model, with 30 and 10 surgical videos for training and validation, respectively. The classification accuracies of the developed models were precision, 0.88; recall, 0.87; F1 score, 0.88; and overall accuracy, 0.89. The inference speed of the proposed model was 32 ps.

conclusionThe developed CNN model automatically recognized the LDG surgical process with relatively high accuracy. Adding more data to this model could provide a fundamental technology that could be used in the development of future surgical instruments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGastrectomyLaparoscopyProof of Concept StudyStomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedSurgery, Computer-AssistedArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningLaparoscopic distal gastrectomyStep recognition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.