ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
A stochastic approach for parameter optimization of feature detection algorithms for non-target screening in mass spectrometry.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundation Models for Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry: A New Era beyond Labeled Datasets.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- [A review and research prospects on the application of the XCMS mass-spectrometry data-processing software in the environmental science field].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Mass Spectrometry Workflows to Systematically Elucidate Transformation Processes of Organic Micropollutants: A Case Study on the Photodegradation of Four Pharmaceuticals.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feature detection plays a crucial role in non-target screening (NTS), requiring careful selection of algorithm parameters to minimize false positive (FP) features. In this study, a stochastic approach was employed to optimize the parameter settings of feature detection algorithms used in processing high-resolution mass spectrometry data. This approach was demonstrated using four open-source algorithms (OpenMS, SAFD, XCMS, and KPIC2) within the patRoon software platform for processing extracts from drinking water samples spiked with 46 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The designed method is based on a stochastic strategy involving random sampling from variable space and the use of Pearson correlation to assess the impact of each parameter on the number of detected suspect analytes. Using our approach, the optimized parameters led to improvement in the algorithm performance by increasing suspect hits in case of SAFD and XCMS, and reducing the total number of detected features (i.e., minimizing FP) for OpenMS. These improvements were further validated on three different drinking water samples as test dataset. The optimized parameters resulted in a lower false discovery rate (FDR%) compared to the default parameters, effectively increasing the detection of true positive features. This work also highlights the necessity of algorithm parameter optimization prior to starting the NTS to reduce the complexity of such datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.