Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38995350›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

Anti-VEGF therapy for the long-term management of diabetic macular edema: a treat-to-target strategy based on macular morphology.

Shintaro Nakao, Sentaro Kusuhara, Tomoaki Murakami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nonadherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in patients with diabetic macular edema : The names of the authors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shintaro NakaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-0052
Sentaro KusuharaDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. kusu@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6458-539X
Tomoaki MurakamiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0314-8807

Funding

Novartis Japan None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an aging population, the prevalence and burden of diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and vision-threatening diabetic macular edema (DME) are only expected to rise around the world. Similarly to other complications of diabetes mellitus, DME requires long-term management. This article aims to review the current challenges associated with the long-term management of DME, opportunities to improve outcomes for patients, and to develop a treat-to-target strategy based on macular morphology. At present, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for the management of DME; however, best-achievable vision outcomes with treatment are reliant on frequent injections and close monitoring, which are difficult to maintain in current clinical practice because of the burden this imposes on patients. Achieving and maintaining good vision with treatment are the most important factors for patients with DME. Landmark trials have shown that vision gains with anti-VEGF therapy are typically accompanied by anatomical improvements (e.g., reductions in retinal thickness); therefore, multimodal imaging measures of macular morphology are often used in patients with DME to guide real-world treatment decisions. We would like to propose a hypothetical treat-to-target algorithm to guide physicians on treatment strategies for the long-term management of DME. Alternative measures of retinal fluid (e.g., persistence, stability, location) may be stronger predictors of visual acuity in DME, although further research is required to confirm whether alternate quantifiable biomarkers such as subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid volumes can be used as a biomarker of clinical improvement. Identifying novel biomarkers and treatments that target neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, improving patient-physician communication around treatment adherence, and using treat-to-target measures may help to ensure that the long-term benefits of treatment are realized.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsDiabetic RetinopathyIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaTomography, Optical CoherenceVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityDisease ManagementHumansAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGF therapyDiabetic macular edemaRetinal fluidRetinal thicknessTreat-to-targetVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID38995350
PMCPMC11608304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.