Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38994778›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2024

Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane Anaesthesia in Terms of Postoperative Nausea-Vomiting Complication in Cardiac Surgery Patients Undergoing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Aslıhan Aykut, Nevriye Salman, Zeliha Aslı Demir, Ayşegül Özgök, Serdar Günaydın

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aslıhan AykutUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0382-3494
Nevriye SalmanUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, Turkey.
Zeliha Aslı DemirUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3053-0443
Ayşegül ÖzgökUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0105-3388
Serdar GünaydınUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-9793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative nausea (PN) and vomiting (PONV) in cardiac surgery increases adrenergic stimulation, limits mobilization and oral intake, and can be distressing for patients. The primary aim of our study was to investigate the effect of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia on the incidence of PONV in cardiac surgery patients undergoing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods: Following ethics committee approval, 62 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery with ERAS protocol were included in this prospective randomized study. After standard induction of anaesthesia, Group S received 1.5-2% sevoflurane and Group P received 50-100 μg kg Results: In the propofol group, 3 patients were excluded due to postoperative tamponade revision and prolonged mechanical ventilation. PN in the early post-extubation period (29% vs. 7.1%, Conclusion: Propofol may reduce the incidence of PN in the first 6 hours after extubation compared with sevoflurane. We believe that this period will be beneficial for gastrointestinal tolerance as it is the period when oral intake is initiated in patients. In conclusion, propofol maintenance in cardiac surgery patients may facilitate patient rehabilitation as part of the ERAS protocol.

Indexed as

Cardiac surgeryERASpostoperative nausea-vomitingpropofolsevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID38994778
PMCPMC11590698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.