Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38994536›Full record

ArticleBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Single Instillation of Hypertonic Saline Immediately Following Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor for Recurrence Prevention -A Phase I Study.

Jonathan Modai, Alexey Kovalyonok, Avigdor Scherz, Dina Preise, Yuval Avda, Igal Shpunt, Keren Sasson, Morad Jaber, Yamit Peretz, Roy Croock and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04147182 (Perioperative Intravesical Instilation of Hypertonic Saline Following Bladder), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04147182 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Perioperative Intravesical Instilation of Hypertonic Saline Following Bladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorDan LeiboviciRan2018 to 2020Enrolled15ConditionsTCCArmsHypertonic Saline 3%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jonathan ModaiUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Alexey KovalyonokUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Avigdor ScherzDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Biochemistry Faculty, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Dina PreiseLife Science Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Yuval AvdaUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Igal ShpuntUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Keren SassonDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Biochemistry Faculty, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Morad JaberUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Yamit PeretzUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Roy CroockUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Yaniv ShiloUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Sergey IkherPathology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Uri LindnerUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Dan LeiboviciUrology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrologic guidelines recommend perioperative instillation of chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) to decrease tumor recurrence, yet implementation of this recommendation is partial due to associated morbidity. Hypertonic saline destroys cells by osmotic dehydration and might present a safer alternative.

objectiveTo evaluate the safety of 3% hypertonic saline (Hypersal) intravesical instillation following TURBT in rats and in humans.

methodsIn 8 rats whose bladders were electrically injured, intravesical blue-dyed Hypersal was administered. We measured serum sodium levels before and after instillation and pathologically evaluated their pelvic cavity for signs of inflammation or blue discoloration. Twenty-four patients were recruited to the human trial (NIH-NCT04147182), 15 comprised the interventional and 10 the control group (one patient crossed over). Hypersal was given postoperatively. Serum sodium was measured before, 1 hour and 12-24 hours after instillation. Adverse effects were documented and compared between the groups.

resultsIn rats, average sodium levels were 140.0 mEq/L and 140.3 mEq/L before and following instillation, respectively. Necropsy revealed no signs of inflammation or blue discoloration. In humans the average plasma sodium levels were 138.6 mEq∖L, 138.8 mEq∖L and 137.7 mEq∖L before, 1 hour and 12-24 hours after instillation, respectively. During the postoperative follow-up there was one case of fever. A month after the surgery, dysuria was reported by 5 patients while urgency and hematuria were reported by one patient each. The most severe adverse events were grade 2 on the Clavien-Dindo scale. Adverse events were similar in the control group.

conclusionsHypersal instillation is safe and tolerable immediately after TURBT.

Indexed as

animal researchBladder tumorclinical trialhypertonic saline solutionintravesical instillationphase 1

Identifiers

PMID38994536
PMCPMC11181719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.