Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38994488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Comparison of injective related reactions following ofatumumab and ocrelizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis: data from the European spontaneous reporting system.

Cristina Scavone, Antonietta Anatriello, Isabella Baccari, Andrea Cantone, Daniele Di Giulio Cesare, Francesca Futura Bernardi, Ornella Moreggia, Valerio Liguori, Vincenzo Andreone, Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Uncovering prognostic biomarkers through a pharmacovigilance study: the case of RDW.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  3. Real-world effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Insights from naïve and switch patients.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cristina Scavone *Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonietta Anatriello *Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Isabella BaccariDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Andrea CantoneDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Daniele Di Giulio CesareMultiple Sclerosis Regional Center, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Francesca Futura BernardiDirectorate-General for Health Protection, Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Ornella MoreggiaMultiple Sclerosis Regional Center, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Valerio LiguoriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo AndreoneNeurological Clinic and Stroke Unit, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Giorgia Teresa ManiscalcoMultiple Sclerosis Regional Center, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Annalisa CapuanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2021 ofatumumab, a recombinant human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) already authorized for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, received the marketing approval for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Differently from ocrelizumab, that is administered intravenously, ofatumumab if the first anti-CD20 mAb to be administered subcutaneously without a premedication. Methods and objectives: In this study we aimed to describe and compare the main characteristics of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) describing the occurrence of Injective Related Reactions (IRRs) following the treatment with ocrelizumab and ofatumumab reported in the Eudravigilance (EV) database during years 2021-2023. Results: A total of 860 ICSRs with either ofatumumab and ocrelizumab as suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 51% associated with ofatumumab and 49% with ocrelizumab. The majority of patients who experienced IRRs following ocrelizumab belonged to the age group of 18-64 years (73%), while the age-group was mostly not specified (55%) in ICSRs reporting ofatumumab as suspected. The distribution of gender was almost similar in the two groups, with the majority of ICSRs related to female patients. "Pyrexia" was the Preferred Term (PT) most reported for ofatumumab, while "Infusion related reaction" were more frequently reported with ocrelizumab. Premedication drugs were reported in 148 ICSRs. Out of 89 ICSRs for which the Time to Event (TTE) was calculated, 74 reported IRRs that occurred the same day of the drug administration. Discussion: Based on the results of this study, although a risk of ofatumumab-induced IRRs cannot be excluded, it should be considered as manageable considering that the drug seems to be mostly associated with the occurrence of fever. Thus, it is important to continue to closely monitor the use of these in clinical practice to improve the knowledge on their long-term safety.

Indexed as

Eudravigilanceinfusion reactionsinjective reactionsmultiple sclerosisocrelizumabofatumumab

Identifiers

PMID38994488
PMCPMC11236557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.