Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38994466›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Prevalence of macrosomic newborn and maternal and neonatal complications in a high-risk maternity.

Kellen Silva Sousa, Henrique Vitor Leite, Mário Dias Corrêa, Matheus Silva Sousa, Anna Luíza Rocha Queiroz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kellen Silva SousaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brasil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3963-5401
Henrique Vitor LeiteUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brasil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2806-8560
Mário Dias CorrêaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brasil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-0546
Matheus Silva SousaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brasil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1930-9062
Anna Luíza Rocha QueirozUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brasil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-3750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the prevalence of macrosomic newborns (birth weight above 4000 grams) in a high-risk maternity from 2014 to 2019, as well as the maternal characteristics involved, risk factors, mode of delivery and associated outcomes, comparing newborns weighing 4000-4500 grams and those weighing above 4500 grams. Methods: This is an observational study, case-control type, carried out by searching for data in hospital's own system and clinical records. The criteria for inclusion in the study were all patients monitored at the service who had newborns with birth weight equal than or greater than 4000 grams in the period from January 2014 to December 2019, being subsequently divided into two subgroups (newborns with 4000 to 4500 grams and newborns above 4500 grams). After being collected, the variables were transcribed into a database, arranged in frequency tables. For treatment and statistical analysis of the data, Results: From 2014 to 2019, 3.3% of deliveries were macrosomic newborns. The average gestational age in the birth was 39.4 weeks. The most common mode of delivery (65%) was cesarean section. Diabetes mellitus was present in 30% of the deliveries studied and glycemic control was absent in most patients. Among the vaginal deliveries, only 6% were instrumented and there was shoulder dystocia in 21% of the cases. The majority (62%) of newborns had some complication, with jaundice (35%) being the most common. Conclusion: Birth weight above 4000 grams had a statistically significant impact on the occurrence of neonatal complications, such as hypoglycemia, respiratory distress and 5th minute APGAR less than 7, especially if birth weight was above 4500 grams. Gestational age was also shown to be statistically significant associated with neonatal complications, the lower, the greater the risk. Thus, macrosomia is strongly linked to complications, especially neonatal complications.

Indexed as

Fetal MacrosomiaAdultBrazilCase-Control StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMalePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy, High-RiskPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung AdultDiabetes, gestationalFetal macrosomiaFetal weightJaundice, neonatalPregnancy, high riskRisk factorsShoulder dystocia

Identifiers

PMID38994466
PMCPMC11239214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.