Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Geraldo DuarteFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-6142
Antonio Rodrigues BragaFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2942-6182
Regis KreitchmannUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre Porto AlegreRS Brazil Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1146-0497
Maria Luiza Bezerra MenezesFaculdade de Ciências Médicas Universidade de Pernambuco RecifePE Brazil Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7001-2005
Angélica Espinosa Barbosa MirandaFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo VitóriaES Brazil Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-8379
Ana Gabriela Alvares TravassosFaculdade de Medicina Universidade do Estado da Bahia SalvadorBA Brazil Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-828X
Patrícia Pereira Dos Santos MelliHospital das Clínicas Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-7102
Roseli Mieko Yamamoto NomuraEscola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São PauloSP Brazil Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-2125
Agnaldo Lopes da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brazil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8486-7861
Maria Celeste Osório WenderUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto AlegreRS Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9085-4605
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment protocol of dengue during pregnancy and the postpartum period. · full record | OpenQuestion