Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38994438›Full record

ArticleJournal of soil and water conservation2024

Implementing constructed wetlands for nutrient reduction at watershed scale: Opportunity to link models and real-world execution.

C T Nietch, R J Hawley, A Safwat, J R Christensen, M T Heberling, J McManus, R McClatchey, H Lubbers, N J Smucker, E Onderak and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of soil and water conservation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

C T NietchUS Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, Ohio.
R J HawleySustainable Streams, LLC, Louisville, Kentucky.
A SafwatAptim Federal Services, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J R ChristensenUS Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, Ohio.
M T HeberlingUS Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J McManusUS Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, Ohio.
R McClatcheyClermont Soil and Water Conservation District, Owensville, Ohio.
H LubbersClermont County Office of Environmental Quality, Batavia, Ohio.
N J SmuckerUS Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Cincinnati, Ohio.
E OnderakColdwater Consulting, LLC, Galena, Ohio.
S MacyDivision of Parks and Watercraft, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The negative effects of nutrient pollution in streams, rivers, and downstream waterbodies remain widespread global problems. Understanding the cost-effectiveness of different strategies for mitigating nutrient pollution is critical to making informed decisions and defining expectations that best utilize limited resources, which is a research priority for the US Environmental Protection Agency. To this end, we modeled nutrient management practices including residue management, cover crops, filter strips, grassed waterways, constructed wetlands, and reducing fertilizer in the upper East Fork of the Little Miami River, an 892 km

Indexed as

constructed wetlandscost effectivenessimplementationinnovative designnutrientpollutionwatershed modeling

Identifiers

PMID38994438
PMCPMC11235211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.