ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Integrated machine learning identifies a cellular senescence-related prognostic model to improve outcomes in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel zinc finger protein gene signature for prognostic prediction, tumor microenvironment characterization, and therapeutic response in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing natural killer cell-related genes for prognostic and therapeutic advances in lung adenocarcinoma: a predictive model for survival and immunotherapy outcomes.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanism paradoxes to precision therapeutics.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Prognostic risk modeling of endometrial cancer using programmed cell death-related genes: a comprehensive machine learning approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) stands as one of the prevalent malignancies impacting women globally. Given its heterogeneous nature, personalized therapeutic approaches are increasingly significant for optimizing patient outcomes. This study investigated the prognostic potential of cellular senescence genes(CSGs) in UCEC, utilizing machine learning techniques integrated with large-scale genomic data. Methods: A comprehensive analysis was conducted using transcriptomic and clinical data from 579 endometrial cancer patients sourced from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A subset of 503 CSGs was assessed through weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) alongside machine learning algorithms, including Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), support vector machine - recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), Random Forest, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), to identify key differentially expressed cellular senescence genes. These genes underwent further analysis to construct a prognostic model. Results: Our analysis revealed two distinct molecular clusters of UCEC with significant differences in tumor microenvironment and survival outcomes. Utilizing cellular senescence genes, a prognostic model effectively stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk categories. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited compromised overall survival and presented distinct molecular and immune profiles indicative of tumor progression. Crucially, the prognostic model demonstrated robust predictive performance and underwent validation in an independent patient cohort. Conclusion: The study emphasized the significance of cellular senescence genes in UCEC progression and underscored the efficacy of machine learning in developing reliable prognostic models. Our findings suggested that targeting cellular senescence holds promise as a strategy in personalized UCEC treatment, thus warranting further clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.