ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024
Effect of nursing intervention on rehabilitation of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps after nasal endoscopy.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic sinusitis is a kind of chronic suppurative inflammation of the sinus mucosa. Nasal endoscopy is a good method to treat nasal polyps. However postoperative rehabilitation and care should not be neglected.
aimTo investigate the Effect of nursing intervention on the rehabilitation of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps (CSNPS) after nasal endoscopy.
methodsA total of 129 patients with CSNPS hospitalized from February 2017 to February 2019 were studied. Using the digital parity method, we investigated nursing cooperation strategies for endoscopic surgery. The comparison group (64 cases): Surgical nursing was carried out with traditional nursing measures; experimental group (65 cases): Surgical nursing was carried out by traditional nursing countermeasures + comprehensive nursing measures. We compared postoperative recovery rates, nursing satisfaction rates, and nasal cavity ratings between the two groups.
resultsExperimental group patients with CSNPS had a significantly higher recovery rate (98.46%) compared to the control group (79.69%). This difference was statistically significant (
conclusionComprehensive nursing intervention in patients with CSNPS can significantly improve the total recovery rate after endoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.