Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38994269›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

Diagnostic Potential of Serum Interleukin-6 in Predicting Bacteremia in Adult Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.

Penna Rv Reddy, Mounika Cherukuri, Vandana K Eshwara, Chandrashekar Udyavara Kudru, Rv Krishnananda Prabhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interleukin-6 in Sepsis-Promising but Yet to Be Proven.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Penna Rv ReddyDepartment of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6457-1412
Mounika CherukuriFaculty of General Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7061-3041
Vandana K EshwaraFaculty of Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7561-4435
Chandrashekar Udyavara KudruFaculty of General Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8274-9677
Rv Krishnananda PrabhuFaculty of Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-9597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the potential of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) as a diagnostic marker in predicting bacteremia and to determine its association with severity and outcome among sepsis patients. Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted, comprising a cohort of 118 patients admitted to the ICU with suspected sepsis from January 2019 to April 2020. Results: Among the 108 patients analyzed, 60 (55.6%) were bacteremic and 48 (44.4%) were nonbacteremic. Of 60 patients with bacteremia, 13 (21.6%) had sepsis and 47 (78.3%) had septic shock. In predicting bacteremia, the area under the curve (AUC) for IL-6 was 0.512 [95% CI, 0.400-0.623]. The AUC for IL-6 in differentiating sepsis from septic shock was 0.724 [95% CI, 0.625-0.823]. The sensitivity and specificity for predicting bacteremia for IL-6 were 66% and 67%, respectively ( Conclusion: C-reactive protein and APACHE II score, lactate and APACHE II score, and PCT, SOFA, and APACHE II scores performed better in predicting bacteremia, sepsis severity, and clinical outcome, respectively compared with IL-6. How to cite this article: Reddy PRV, Cherukuri M, Eshwara VK, Kudru CU, Prabhu RVK. Diagnostic Potential of Serum Interleukin-6 in Predicting Bacteremia in Adult Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):637-644.

Indexed as

BacteremiaInterleukin-6MortalitySepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID38994269
PMCPMC11234134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.