ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Does China's national volume-based drug procurement policy promote or hinder pharmaceutical innovation?
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unintended consequences of National centralized volume-based drug procurement policy in China: a game theory-based analytical approach for pharmaceutical quality and pricing.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Analysis of the impact of national centralized volume-based procurement drug policy on the market dynamics of tuberculosis drugs.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The impact of China's National Drug Centralized Procurement Policy on pharmaceutical firm innovation: evidence from a staggered difference-in-differences analysis.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Changes in neonatal inpatient resource utilization and cost drivers under payment reform: a five-year retrospective real-world data study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of combined medication payment management policies on population health performance.PloS one · 2026Article
- Impact of a pharmacist driven antimicrobial stewardship program on inpatient antibiotic consumption in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital: a 5-year retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative study on government subsidy models for competitive drug supply chains under centralized procurement policy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Can the Marketing Authorisation Holder system improve the ESG performance of pharmaceutical manufacturers?Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The national volume-based drug procurement policy initiated in China since 2018 represents a significant reform in China's pharmaceutical distribution system. It has largely squeezed out the price bubble of low-end generic drugs, making competition in the pharmaceutical sales segment more intense and transparent. This policy intervenes in the distribution link of the pharmaceutical industry by intensifying market competition, thereby enhancing the innovation willingness and R&D capabilities of pharmaceutical companies. Methods: Taking the national volume-based drug procurement policy as the policy shock, we used the multi-period difference-in-difference method to study the impact of the policy on innovation input, innovation output quantity and innovation output quality of listed pharmaceutical companies and its impact mechanism. Results: We found that the volume-based policy can significantly promote the pharmaceutical companies' innovation input and the innovation output quality, but significantly reduced the innovation output quantity. For innovative and generic drug companies, this policy has limited impact on innovative drug companies, but force generic drug companies to pay more attention to cost control and market positioning, and the quality and cost-effectiveness of R&D output to ensure competitiveness in the market. For bid-winning and non-winning companies, the policy has a greater innovation incentive for non-winning companies than winning companies, by imposing greater survival pressure on non-winning companies, forcing them to increase R&D investment intensity and adopt the innovation strategy of preferring quality to quantity. Discussion: The results show that the national volume-based drug procurement policy should be expanded to lower drug prices and lighten the medical burden on patients, with enhanced quality and safety supervision. Additionally, it suggests cautious application of such policies to innovative and high-end generic drugs to encourage continued pharmaceutical innovation and industry advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.