Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38994156›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2024

Extrahepatic cholestasis associated with paracoccidioidomycosis: Challenges in the differential diagnosis of biliopancreatic neoplasia.

José Sebastião Dos Santos, Vitor de Moura Arrais, William José Rosseto Ferreira, Ricardo Ribeiro Correa Filho, Mariângela Ottoboni Brunaldi, Rafael Kemp, Ajith Kumar Sankanrakutty, Jorge Elias Junior, Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues, Roberto Martinez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

José Sebastião Dos SantosFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vitor de Moura ArraisFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
William José Rosseto FerreiraFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Ribeiro Correa FilhoFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariângela Ottoboni BrunaldiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Patologia, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael KempFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ajith Kumar SankanrakuttyFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge Elias JuniorUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Imagens Médicas, Hematologia e Oncologia Clínica, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Bellissimo-RodriguesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Medicina Social , Ribeirão Preto 14015-010, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto MartinezUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Clínica Médica, Ribeirão Preto 14015-010, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edson Zangiacomi MartinezUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Medicina Social , Ribeirão Preto 14015-010, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Celso ArdenghUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil and Hospital Moriah, Serviço de Endoscopia Digestiva, São Paulo 04084-002, São Paulo, Brazil. jcelso@uol.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParacoccidioidomycosis (PCM) may involve the hepatic pedicle and peripancreatic lymph nodes, cause damage to the bile duct and manifest, exceptionally, in combination with extrahepatic cholestasis (EHC), making investigation and treatment challenging.

aimTo investigate the management of patients with visceral PCM admitted with EHC.

methodsAll patients diagnosed with PCM treated in a public, tertiary teaching hospital between 1982 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Those also identified with EHC were allocated to two groups according to the treatment approach for the purpose of comparing clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings, resources used for etiological diagnosis, treatment results, and prognosis. Statistical analyses were performed using the linear mixed-effects model (random and fixed effects), which was adjusted using the PROC MIXED procedure of the SAS

resultsOf 1645 patients diagnosed with PCM, 40 (2.4%) had EHC. Of these, 20 (50.0%) lived in the rural area and 29 (72.5%) were men, with a mean age of 27.1 years (3-65 years). Jaundice as first symptom and weight loss of at least 10 kg were observed in 16 patients (40.0%), and a mass in the head of the pancreas was observed in 8 (20.0%). The etiological diagnosis was made by tissue collection during surgery in 4 cases (10.0%) and by endoscopic methods in 3 cases (7.5%). Twenty-seven patients (67.5%) received drug treatment alone (Group 1), whereas 13 (32.5%) underwent endoscopic and/or surgical procedures in combination with drug treatment (Group 2). EHC was significantly reduced in both groups (40.7% in Group 1, with a mean time of 3 months; and 38.4% in Group 2, with a mean time of 7.5 months), with no statistically significant difference between them. EHC recurrence rates, associated mainly with treatment nonadherence, were similar in both groups: 37% in Group 1 and 15.4% in Group 2. The mortality rate was 18.5% in Group 1 and 23% in Group 2, with survival estimates of 71.3% and 72.5%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference.

conclusionAlthough PCM-related EHC is rare, it needs to be included in the differential diagnosis of malignancies, as timely treatment can prevent hepatic and extrahepatic sequelae.

Indexed as

BlastomycosisCholestasisDiagnosisJaundiceObstructiveParacoccidioidesTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38994156
PMCPMC11236263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.