Vulnerability assessment for physical protection systems of cave temples: A fuzzy petri net approach.

Si Chen, Dongming Xiang, Bo Jin, Hua Jin

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Si ChenCollege of Information and Cyber Security, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing, 100038, China.

Dongming XiangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China.

Bo JinNational Engineering Research Center of Classified Protection and Safeguard Technology for Cybersecurity, The Third Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security Shanghai, Shanghai, 200030, China.

Hua JinCollege of Information and Cyber Security, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing, 100038, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation of cultural relics is crucial for cultural sustainability, particularly in the case of cave temples, which are a unique and immovable part of our heritage, nested within mountains. These structures bear immense historical significance and possess considerable economic value, making them vulnerable to criminal activities, notably theft. Establishing a robust physical protection system (PPS) is imperative to safeguard these relics from potential damage. This paper proposes a novel approach for assessing the vulnerability of cave temples' PPS. Based on the fuzzy Petri net (FPN) principle, a comprehensive vulnerability assessment index system was developed within the PPS framework, considering the unique characteristics of cave temples. This study refines the formal definition of the FPN, enhancing its precision and effectiveness for vulnerability assessment. The practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified through simulation experiments. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate this approach.

Indexed as

Cave templeExpert systemFuzzy petri netsHeritage conservationPhysical protection systemVulnerability assessment

Identifiers

PMID38994053

DOI10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33100

PMCPMC11238042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.