ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2024
Accurate Neonatal Face Detection for Improved Pain Classification in the Challenging NICU Setting.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Pain in Infants of the First 100 Days of Age With Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- A Public Health Approach to Automated Pain Intensity Recognition in Chest Pain Patients via Facial Expression Analysis for Emergency Care Prioritization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Objective Detection of Newborn Infant Acute Procedural Pain Using EEG and Machine Learning Algorithms.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2025Article
- The Potential for High-Priority Care Based on Pain Through Facial Expression Detection with Patients Experiencing Chest Pain.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a tendency for object detection systems using off-the-shelf algorithms to fail when deployed in complex scenes. The present work describes a case for detecting facial expression in post-surgical neonates (newborns) as a modality for predicting and classifying severe pain in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Our initial testing showed that both an off-the-shelf face detector and a machine learning algorithm trained on adult faces failed to detect facial expression of neonates in the NICU. We improved accuracy in this complex scene by training a state-of-the-art "You-Only-Look-Once" (YOLO) face detection model using the USF-MNPAD-I dataset of neonate faces. At run-time our trained YOLO model showed a difference of 8.6% mean Average Precision (mAP) and 21.2% Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) for automatic classification of neonatal pain compared with manual pain scoring by NICU nurses. Given the challenges, time and effort associated with collecting ground truth from the faces of post-surgical neonates, here we share the weights from training our YOLO model with these facial expression data. These weights can facilitate the further development of accurate strategies for detecting facial expression, which can be used to predict the time to pain onset in combination with other sensory modalities (body movements, crying frequency, vital signs). Reliable predictions of time to pain onset in turn create a therapeutic window of time wherein NICU nurses and providers can implement safe and effective strategies to mitigate severe pain in this vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.