Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993988›Full record

ArticleBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

The Pros and Cons of "Machination of Medicine" in Genitourinary Oncology Practice.

Filippo Pederzoli, Marco Bandini, Daniele Raggi, Jeffrey S Ross, Philippe E Spiess, Andrea Necchi

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filippo PederzoliVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Marco BandiniVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Daniele RaggiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Philippe E SpiessMoffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Andrea NecchiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability of genomic sequencing of tumor tissue in oncology provided valuable insights into tumor evolution and offered clinicians the unprecedented opportunity to tailor therapies on each individual patient, according to the treatment-impacting alterations identified in the tumor cells. In addition to the characterization of somatic alterations in tumor samples, the identification of germline (i.e., constitutional) pathogenic variants can provide additional information to guide informed and personalized therapeutic planning for patients and to enable risk-based screening protocols for at-risk relatives. In genitourinary malignancies, only a few associations between germline mutations and cancer risk and behavior have been thoroughly investigated (e.g., alterations in DNA repair genes in prostate cancer or mutations in Lynch syndrome genes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma). To achieve a wider use of both tumor genomic and germline genetic testing, an integrative approach led by scientific societies is necessary to involve physicians, patients and advocacy groups, to develop a shared strategy to advance the field and provide value-based and reproducible standards of care for patients and their families.

Indexed as

biomarkersGenitourinary tumorsmolecular alterationsnext-generation sequencingtargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID38993988
PMCPMC11181775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.