ReviewPeerJ2024
Green nanobiocatalysts: enhancing enzyme immobilization for industrial and biomedical applications.
Review in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering nanozymes for cancer theranostics: Chemical design, catalytic intelligence, and translational oncology frontiers.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Green synthesis of rosehip-derived carbon quantum dots for reusable biocatalysts in sustainable fruit juice clarification.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Smart nanobiocatalysts for waste-to-biofuel conversion: integrating Nano-Bio interfaces and AI-driven design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Prospects and problems in enzyme immobilization methodology: comprehensive review.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Enzyme Immobilization on Nanomaterials and Their Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Magnetizing Biotech-Advances in (In Vivo) Magnetic Enzyme Immobilization.Engineering in life sciences · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial scaffolds for enzymatic polymer degradation: a tool to advance current biodegradation assessments of polymers in liquid formulation.Bioscience nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Enzyme-displaying spores as a novel strategy for mixed fiber textile recycling.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Review
- Metal-organic frameworks in drug delivery: engineering versatile platforms for therapeutic applications.RSC advances · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanobiocatalysts (NBCs), which merge enzymes with nanomaterials, provide a potent method for improving enzyme durability, efficiency, and recyclability. This review highlights the use of eco-friendly synthesis methods to create sustainable nanomaterials for enzyme transport. We investigate different methods of immobilization, such as adsorption, ionic and covalent bonding, entrapment, and cross-linking, examining their pros and cons. The decreased environmental impact of green-synthesized nanomaterials from plants, bacteria, and fungi is emphasized. The review exhibits the various uses of NBCs in food industry, biofuel production, and bioremediation, showing how they can enhance effectiveness and eco-friendliness. Furthermore, we explore the potential impact of NBCs in biomedicine. In general, green nanobiocatalysts are a notable progression in enzyme technology, leading to environmentally-friendly and effective biocatalytic methods that have important impacts on industrial and biomedical fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.