Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993960›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Brazil: an epidemiological study on the distribution of equipment and frequency of examinations, with comparisons between the public and private sectors.

Camila de Almeida Costa Alencar, Dante Claudino de Oliveira, Aylla Batista Moreira Teixeira, Lívia Maria Goes Lemos, Raquel Cristina Saldanha Quesado, Ionara Maria de Almeida Santos, Carolina Freitas Lins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camila de Almeida Costa AlencarEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-2987
Dante Claudino de OliveiraEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3489-0027
Aylla Batista Moreira TeixeiraEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1733-5870
Lívia Maria Goes LemosEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0000-6341-2764
Raquel Cristina Saldanha QuesadoEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8024-2477
Ionara Maria de Almeida SantosEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-1717-5451
Carolina Freitas LinsEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8084-0234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare information on highly complex radiological procedures-computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-between the public and private health care systems, across the five regions of Brazil, in terms of the numbers of radiological devices and examinations performed, between 2015 and 2021. Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive time series analysis of secondary data in the public domain, available from the Information Technology Department of the Brazilian Unified Health Care System, an entity of the Brazilian National Ministry of Health (NMH) that is responsible for collecting and storing health-related information in Brazil. The analysis included the numbers of CT and MRI scanners; the volumes and types of examinations; the type of institution (public or private); the regions of the country; and the years (2015 to 2021). Results: Progressive increases in the numbers of CT and MRI devices, as well as in the volumes of examinations, were observed over the years in all regions of the country. The private sector showed higher rates of equipment acquisition and of growth in the number of examinations. However, the public health care system did not reach the equipment targets set by the NMH, whereas the private health care system surpassed those targets. A greater number of examinations were performed in the private sector than in the public sector. Conclusion: During the period evaluated, the public health care system did not meet the equipment or examination targets recommended by the NMH, in any of the regions of the country, unlike the private health care system, which exceeded both in all of the regions.

Indexed as

Health information systemsMagnetic resonance imagingPrivate sectorPublic sectorTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID38993960
PMCPMC11235069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.