Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993906›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in transplantation2023

Clinical impact of early post-transplant red cell transfusions in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sevda Hassan, Sarah Gleeson, Tina Thomson, Katrina J Spensley, Frank Dor, Colin Brown, Fiona Regan, Liset H M Pengel, Michelle Willicombe, David J Roberts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sevda HassanImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah GleesonImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Tina ThomsonImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Katrina J SpensleyImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Frank DorImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Colin BrownHistocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood and Transplant, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona ReganBlood Transfusion, NHS Blood and Transplant, London, United Kingdom.
Liset H M PengelPeter Morris Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michelle WillicombeImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
David J RobertsBRC Haematology Theme, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, and Department of Haematology Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) represent a potentially modifiable risk factor for HLA sensitisation and adverse outcomes post transplantation. Evidence of the clinical impact of post-transplant RBCT has been infrequently reported. Herein, we performed a systematic review of available literature to assess the prevalence of RBCT post kidney transplant, and the effect of transfusion on transplant outcomes. Methods: We included studies from 2000 to July 2022, published on Medline, Embase and the Transplant Library. Results: Ten studies were analysed which included a total of 32,817 kidney transplant recipients, with a median transfusion prevalence of 40% (range 18-64%). There was significant heterogeneity between studies in terms of patient and allograft characteristics, immunological risk, and immunosuppression protocols. Analysis of unadjusted outcomes showed that post-transplant RBCTs are associated with inferior patient survival, allograft loss, rejection and donor specific antibodies. Adjusted outcomes were described where available, and supported the adverse associations seen in the unadjusted models in many studies. Discussion: This review demonstrates that RBCT post-transplant are common and maybe associated with inferior outcomes, highlighting the urgent need for high quality prospective evidence of the effect of RBCTs on transplant outcomes. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42022348763767.

Indexed as

blood transfusionkidneyoutcomespost-transplanttransplant

Identifiers

PMID38993906
PMCPMC11235259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.