Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993899›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in transplantation2023

Liquid biopsy for non-invasive monitoring of patients with kidney transplants.

Anthony Nassar, Katharine Cashman, Shreya Rao, Maribel Dagher, Connor O'Brien, John Afif, Paolo Cravedi, Jamil R Azzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anthony NassarTransplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Katharine CashmanTransplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Shreya RaoTransplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Maribel DagherTransplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Connor O'BrienTransplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
John AfifTransplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Paolo CravediDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Jamil R AzziTransplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current tools for diagnosing and monitoring native kidney diseases as well as allograft rejection in transplant patients are suboptimal. Creatinine and proteinuria are non-specific and poorly sensitive markers of injury. Tissue biopsies are invasive and carry potential complications. In this article, we overview the different techniques of liquid biopsy and discuss their potential to improve patients' kidney health. Several diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers have been identified with the ability to detect and monitor the activity of native kidney diseases as well as early and chronic allograft rejection, such as donor-derived cell-free DNA, exosomes, messenger RNA/microsomal RNA, proteomics, and so on. While the results are encouraging, additional research is still needed as no biomarker appears to be perfect for a routine application in clinical practice. Despite promising advancements in biomarkers, the most important issue is the lack of standardized pre-analytical criteria. Large validation studies and uniformed standard operating procedures are required to move the findings from bench to bedside. Establishing consortia such as the Liquid Biopsy Consortium for Kidney Diseases can help expedite the research process, allow large studies to establish standardized procedures, and improve the management and outcomes of kidney diseases and of kidney transplant recipients.

Indexed as

biomarkerscytokinesddcfDNAexosomeskidney diseaseskidney transplantationliquid biopsyproteomics

Identifiers

PMID38993899
PMCPMC11235308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.