ArticleTzu chi medical journal
Rituximab versus tacrolimus as corticosteroid-sparing therapy for children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials.
Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Prolonged use of corticosteroids induced complicated course in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), and the use of tacrolimus, a first-line alternative calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) agent was related to some unwanted adverse effects. Rituximab, a second alternative treatment has been proven to reliably reduce the number of relapses within 12 months with minimal adverse effects. Materials and Methods: Our review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. All the databases were derived from MEDLINE, Proquest, EBSCOhost, Wiley, and Google Scholar within the past 11 years. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. Meta-analysis used Review Manager (version 5.4) with a random effect model to obtain a pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Four studies were included based on our eligibility criteria, and only three were included in the quantitative analysis. Three studies had low and one study had a moderate risk of bias. Pooled data results indicated that Rituximab was superior to tacrolimus in reducing the number of patients with 1-2 relapses (MD = 0.44, [95% CI: 0.21-0.91]) and had higher eGFR values (MD = 6.67; [CI - 2.92-10.61]). However, Rituximab showed insignificant superiority compared to tacrolimus in reducing the number of patients with 3 relapses, sustained remission, cumulative steroid use, serum cholesterol, and serum albumin concentrations. Conclusion: Rituximab exhibits more advantages in treating SDNS compared to tacrolimus, although the treatment options are highly individualized. Both regimens must also be weighed against their potential side effects to achieve a better overall health status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.