Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993685›Full record

ArticleBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

MHC I Expression Predicts Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma but Lacks Prognostic Value in Localized Disease.

Julia Slotta-Huspenina, Kristina Schwamborn, Katja Steiger, Ricarda Simon, Florian Paul Kirchhoff, Jakob Wolf Büchler, Julia Fiedler, Margitta Retz, Roman Nawroth, Christoph Ritschel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julia Slotta-HuspeninaInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kristina SchwambornInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ricarda SimonDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian Paul KirchhoffDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jakob Wolf BüchlerDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia FiedlerDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Margitta RetzDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Roman NawrothDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph RitschelDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jürgen Erich GschwendDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas HornDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoss of MHC I expression is a tumoral escape mechanism, part of the process of immunoediting. MHC expression patterns and their prognostic and predictive value have not been studied in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UC) so far.

objectiveTo correlate the expression of MHC I and MHC II with prognosis after curative treatment, response to chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed different patient cohorts for their expression of MHC I(HLA-A/B/C) and II (HLA-DR/DP/DQ) and examined potential correlations with prognosis and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy or PD-1/PD-L1 directed immunotherapy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, MHC expression was analyzed in 246 patients, and complete MHC I loss was seen in 29.7% of patients. In 35% of patients aberrant tumoral expression of MHC II was observed. In a homogeneous cohort of 149 patients with cystectomy with curative intent there were no significant differences in survival between the MHC expression groups. MHC I+ and MHC II+ patients had higher infiltration densities with CD8+ T effector cells.An analysis of 77 additional patients (cohort II) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy revealed no associations of MHC status with response defined as < pT2 pN0 in the cystectomy specimen. Lastly, we analyzed 26 patients with metastatic disease treated with PD-1/PD-L1 directed immunotherapy (cohort III, best response: 11 PD, 5 SD, 10 OR) and observed responses exclusively in MHC I+ patients (10/19 patients, 52.6). All four MHC I+ /MHC II+ /PD-L1+ patients had a progression-free interval of at least 12 months.

conclusionsTumoral MHC I expression is frequently lost in UC. We found no association with prognosis or response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy but response to checkpoint inhibitors was limited to MHC I+ patients.

Indexed as

Bladder cancerimmunotherapyMHC expression

Identifiers

PMID38993685
PMCPMC11181837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.