ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Optimizing hybrid ensemble feature selection strategies for transcriptomic biomarker discovery in complex diseases.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- When complexity does not pay: benchmarking deep learning and ensemble methods for biomarker discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Prognostic biomarker discovery in pancreatic cancer through hybrid ensemble feature selection and multi-omics data.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Variant-to-Biomarker Integration and Mechanistic Validation Identify CES1 as a Copy Number-Linked Predictor of Radiotherapy Response in Rectal Cancer.Human mutation · 2026Article
- LOXL1, THY1, and TYMS define an annotation-derived hemoglobin-associated immunotranscriptomic signature in osteoarthritis cartilage.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- THe Biom: a platform for visualization and exploration of cancer transcriptomic biomarkers identified by robust feature selection.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- AI-powered precision medicine: utilizing genetic risk factor optimization to revolutionize healthcare.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical research takes advantage of omic data, such as transcriptomics, to unravel the complexity of diseases. A conventional strategy identifies transcriptomic biomarkers characterized by expression patterns associated with a phenotype by relying on feature selection approaches. Hybrid ensemble feature selection (HEFS) has become increasingly popular as it ensures robustness of the selected features by performing data and functional perturbations. However, it remains difficult to make the best suited choices at each step when designing such approaches. We conducted an extensive analysis of four possible HEFS scenarios for the identification of Stage IV colorectal, Stage I kidney and lung and Stage III endometrial cancer biomarkers from transcriptomic data. These scenarios investigate the use of two types of feature reduction by filters (differentially expressed genes and variance) conjointly with two types of resampling strategies (repeated holdout by distribution-balanced stratified and random stratified) for downstream feature selection through an aggregation of thousands of wrapped machine learning models. Based on our results, we emphasize the advantages of using HEFS approaches to identify complex disease biomarkers, given their ability to produce generalizable and stable results to both data and functional perturbations. Finally, we highlight critical issues that need to be considered in the design of such strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.