Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993628›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Examining feature extraction and classification modules in machine learning for diagnosis of low-dose computed tomographic screening-detected

Daniel D Liang, David D Liang, Marc J Pomeroy, Yongfeng Gao, Licheng R Kuo, Lihong C Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel D LiangWard Melville High School, East Setauket, New York, United States.
David D LiangUniversity of Chicago, Department of Computer Science, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Marc J PomeroyState University of New York, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook, New York, United States.
Yongfeng GaoState University of New York, Department of Radiology, Stony Brook, New York, United States.
Licheng R KuoState University of New York, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook, New York, United States.
Lihong C LiCity University of New York/CSI, Department of Engineering and Environment Science, Staten Island, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5440-8242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Medical imaging-based machine learning (ML) for computer-aided diagnosis of Approach: Three feature extraction methods were investigated. One uses the mathematical descriptor of gray-level co-occurrence image texture measure to extract the Haralick image texture features (HFs). One uses the convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture to extract deep learning (DL) image abstractive features (DFs). The third one uses the interactions between lesion tissues and X-ray energy of CT to extract tissue-energy specific characteristic features (TFs). All the above three categories of extracted features were classified by the random forest (RF) classifier with comparison to the DL-CNN method, which reads the images, extracts the DFs, and classifies the DFs in an end-to-end manner. The ML diagnosis of lesions or prediction of lesion malignancy was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three lesion image datasets were used. The lesions' tissue pathological reports were used as the learning labels. Results: Experiments on the three datasets produced AUC values of 0.724 to 0.878 for the HFs, 0.652 to 0.965 for the DFs, and 0.985 to 0.996 for the TFs, compared to the DL-CNN of 0.694 to 0.964. These experimental outcomes indicate that the RF classifier performed comparably to the DL-CNN classification module and the extraction of tissue-energy specific characteristic features dramatically improved AUC value. Conclusions: The feature extraction module is more important than the feature classification module. Extraction of tissue-energy specific characteristic features is more important than extraction of image abstractive and characteristic features.

Indexed as

computer-aided diagnosisdiagnosis of in vivo lesionsearly cancer detectionlow-dose computed tomographic screeningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38993628
PMCPMC11234229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.