Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993620›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024

Artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound imaging in hemophilia: research, development, and evaluation of hemarthrosis and synovitis detection.

Azusa Nagao, Yusuke Inagaki, Keiji Nogami, Naoya Yamasaki, Fuminori Iwasaki, Yang Liu, Yoichi Murakami, Takahiro Ito, Hideyuki Takedani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in clinical thrombosis and hemostasis: A review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Azusa NagaoDepartment of Blood Coagulation, Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke InagakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Keiji NogamiDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Naoya YamasakiDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Fuminori IwasakiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yang LiuClinical Development Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoichi MurakamiMedical Affairs Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro ItoMedical Affairs Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideyuki TakedaniDepartment of Rehabilitation, National Hospital Organization Tsuruga Medical Center, Fukui, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Joint bleeding can lead to synovitis and arthropathy in people with hemophilia, reducing quality of life. Although early diagnosis is associated with improved therapeutic outcomes, diagnostic ultrasonography requires specialist experience. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms may support ultrasonography diagnoses. Objectives: This study will research, develop, and evaluate the diagnostic precision of an AI algorithm for detecting the presence or absence of hemarthrosis and synovitis in people with hemophilia. Methods: Elbow, knee, and ankle ultrasound images were obtained from people with hemophilia from January 2010 to March 2022. The images were used to train and test the AI models to estimate the presence/absence of hemarthrosis and synovitis. The primary endpoint was the area under the curve for the diagnostic precision to diagnose hemarthrosis and synovitis. Other endpoints were the rate of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Out of 5649 images collected, 3435 were used for analysis. The area under the curve for hemarthrosis detection for the elbow, knee, and ankle joints was ≥0.87 and for synovitis, it was ≥0.90. The accuracy and precision for hemarthrosis detection were ≥0.74 and ≥0.67, respectively, and those for synovitis were ≥0.83 and ≥0.74, respectively. Analysis across people with hemophilia aged 10 to 60 years showed consistent results. Conclusion: AI models have the potential to aid diagnosis and enable earlier therapeutic interventions, helping people with hemophilia achieve healthy and active lives. Although AI models show potential in diagnosis, evidence is unclear on required control for abnormal findings. Long-term observation is crucial for assessing impact on joint health.

Indexed as

AI (artificial intelligence)hemarthrosishemophiliasynovitisultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID38993620
PMCPMC11238186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.